
Council members debated the matter, acknowledging the state pressure for a new plant versus the potentially high cost.
"I guess Ecology doesn't give a damn how deep in debt Cathlamet has to go," said Council Member Bob Rendler.
"They probably wouldn't agree, but it would seem that way," Swart replied.
However, other officials supported the design work.
Public Works Superintendent David Vik commented that Ecology wants to see the old plant replaced.
"You've got to design it someday," Vik said. "For 20 years, it's been out of compliance. We could be subject to a third party lawsuit, and Ecology could order us to fix it. That happened to Pe Ell."
Former town attorney Fred Johnson said that in the past, Ecology funded projects that addressed the department's concerns.
"In reality, if you're a good little town, you'll make your case," he said. "If you resist, they'll bring out the hammer and say, 'Find the $12 million.'"
Council Member Wally Wright said the design would be a good investment. The town will have to pay $318,600 of the $718,000 design cost, he said, but in the long run, the town doubles its money and will get a good financial package.
Ken Alexander of Gray & Osborne, the consulting engineer, said the process has worked elsewhere. The firm recently worked with the Town of Warden which went through a similar process.
"You won't get the $13 million in one swoop," he added. "So you'll have to go to several sources. That's how the game is played. If you don't have the design, you can'tt get more money."
Wright's motion to support the design grant passed 3-2 with Wright, Bill Talbott and Steve McNicholas voting in favor and Rendler and David Goodroe opposing.